Skwid presents The Humblest Blog on the Net
HUMBLE RESOURCES

Home
Old Index
The Dragon's Scepter
In Media Res

RECENT HUMILITY

The Scorpion's Gate

Changes at The Humblest Blog

Master of Wolves

The Light Fantastic

Breakfast at Tiffany's

The Alienist

X-Men III

Until Forever

Lucky

Wonderfalls

Expendable

PREVIOUS HUMILITY


Our Humble Archives
Skwid Pandabob T-Rex
VeggieSteph Rachelle

BOOKLOGS

The Library of Babel
Outside of a Dog
Pam's Book Log
Shards of Delirium
Shih
The Tufted Shoot
Weasel Words

HUMBLY YOURS

Blarg?
Boing-Boing
GA Guru
Guru2
The Little Professor
Lundblog & Lundblogblog
Making Light
Musical Perceptions
Pandabob
Peeps!
Peg-Leg Pete
Squidblog
Uncertain Principles
Unmistakable Marks
UselessBlogging
VeggieSteph
The Wildebeest Asylum
YellowText

CALENDAR & SEARCH

July 2005
SMTWTFS
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

LEGAL

Content Copyright 2005 by Evan "Skwid" Langlinais unless otherwise noted.
All rights reserved.


Powered By Greymatter

RSS 1.0 FEED
Powered by gm-rss
Livejournal RSS



[Previous entry: "Sisters"] [Next entry: "Like a Floridian Hurricane Survivor"]

07/18/2005 10:41 AM
reading

The Italian Boy: A Tale of Murder and Body Snatching in 1830s London by Sarah Wise



Kitty! Kitty! Kitty! Half A Kitty. No Kitty!

The Italian Boy is a true crime novel based on the infamous 1831 London case of Williams, May, and Bishop, body snatchers and murderers. The book includes chapters that outline the history of the areas where the crimes were committed, and includes a fairly thorough account of the crimes and trial, considering the lack of official court documentation available.

While I enjoyed the main story and its look into the crime of body snatching, I felt like the extra chapters devoted to the history of the police force, the various boroughs, and the like, were filler rather than integral to the story. Maybe if the author had condensed those sections into a chapter of the overall history of 1930s London, I wouldn’t have felt that way. Instead, the chapters were interspersed amongst the story of the crime and trial, breaking the small amount of tension provided by that story.



Otherwise, the story of Williams, May, and Bishop is a limited look into the life of the poor, the ease at which they were lost in the streets, the difficulties of police investigation, the medical profession, and the judicial system of 1831 London. Because the government regulated the use of cadavers, the London poor found a way to make money – stealing cadavers from graves and selling them to medical schools. Once the police started cracking down on the thieves, they found another way to provide bodies to the medical schools for dissection; they would murder the unsuspecting lost and poor out on the streets looking for work. Williams, May, and Bishop were suspected, tried, and convicted of the harvesting of “The Italian Boy” and at least one other, and of selling the bodies to medical schools. The police suspected the trio of killing many more than just the two people, but without the “produce,” they were unable to prove it. While they confessed to the crimes of which they were charged plus a few more, there is some speculation as to whether they confessed to all of their murders, if they actually killed "The Italian Boy" or if he was someone else entirely, or if their families were as blameless as they claimed. (With public outcry being entense and wide-spread, it is a strong possibility that they shielded their families as best they could by covering for them.)

It was worth a read, I just wish it had more detail (like Helter Skelter). I understand why there wasn’t more detail (lack of court documents, required use of newspaper articles that weren't always reliable), but I think that is why the filler chapters disappointed me so much. It felt like I was paying for a novel, when I should have paid for a novella.


The Humblest Blog has moved! To comment on these entries, please visit the new Humblest Blog.