Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell

April 24th, 2005

Once again we, the readers, are thrust into the speech and forms of England’s post-Renaissance glory days. I suppose it’s in vogue at the moment as far as settings are concerned, or something, although this time it’s Regency period. Mrs. Clarke, in a very impressive first novel, makes a serious impression; with polished prose, believable characters, and an intricate plot. The England of the book is one with a deep and complicated history of magical involvement at both high and low levels of society. The entirety of Northern England, in fact, was ruled as a separate kingdom for 300 years by a strange and mysterious magician commonly called the Raven King, although he disappeared over 300 years prior to the events described. Since his leaving, magic (and the Fairies who seemed to accompany much of it) has all but faded away, with no magician known to have successfully performed a spell in a century or so when our story opens in early 1806.

Magicians are not all gone, or at least there are many of England’s idle gentlemen who call themselves such, but in truth what they are is historians of the magic that once thrived in their land and the magicians who practiced it. There is an exception, though…a man named Norrell, who has gathered in his remote country estate a library of books on magic unrivaled anywhere else in England. He and his mysterious servant, Childermass, have been collecting them from every bookseller, estate sale, and other venue for decades. Even duplicates on any book are snatched up, because Mr. Norrell doesn’t just want to have the books…he wants to be the only one with the books, because he doesn’t just want to be a magical historian, he wants to be the greatest practicing magician in England. He craves that fame and acclaim greater than anything else, and has bent his life and fortune towards that goal since childhood.

And it works. Through various acts of magic and social adventure, Norrell introduces himself (unimpressive as he is) and his magic (which is powerfully impressive if uninspired) to England, and makes himself useful to the Government in their war against Napoleon. So useful, in fact, that the Government is soon urging him to find more magicians to train and assist them where needed. This is Norrell’s worst nightmare, and he puts them off for as long as he can, but another country gentleman, named (somewhat dramatically) Jonathon Strange finds himself in need of a stable profession, and when some spells find their way into his hands, it occurs to him that perhaps magician would be a good one. To his surprise (and that of his friends and loved ones), it holds his attention for far longer than any of the other occupations he had pursued; indeed it becomes his passion, and one he discovers a great talent for.

England, though Norrell would have sought otherwise, has acquired for itself two practicing magicians, and soon enough Strange seeks out Norrell and enters into formal apprenticeship with him, and although their personalities and opinions on magic often differ, they make an excellent team…for a time. Elsewhere, unintended consequences of some of Norrell’s early actions in attracting attention and securing his position as England’s greatest magician have resulted in members of a prominent politician’s household suffering under a fairie enchantment. The executor of this enchantment, a character called only “The Man With the Thistle-Down Hair,” is probably the best representation of the Sidhe I’ve seen since Feist’s under-celebrated Faerie Tale. This guy is fascinating, funny, and creepy. A delicious villain the likes of whom I have not read in a while (Here’s hoping Mr. Depp gets the part in the film version…he’d be perfect), his mysterious motivations and actions soon grow in consequence and scope, even threatening the King in his intrigues.

This was a delightful book to read, quick and fun with both humor and pathos; and illustrated (at least in the hardcover edition which I acquired) not only by vivid imagery in the prose, but literally, in occasional lovely charcoal sketches by Portia Rosenberg. Additionally, Mrs. Clarke makes extensive use of footnotes, in a style which is somewhat reminiscent of Terry Pratchett. There is at least one occasion in which the text of the story itself is limited to four bare lines at the top of opposing leaves, while a footnote (from the previous page!) rambles on and on underneath it. The advantage is palpable, as it allows the reader to percieve some of the depth of the world without the awkward convention of the infodump, where characters relate to other characters things that they almost certainly should have known; and it is also done simply for flavor, as with those footnotes which are simply publishing information to a referenced (fictional) text, much as you would find in any book intended for a scholarly audience.

My only frustrations were in interesting avenues and characters left unexplored, like the tragically under-utilised Mr. Segundus, or the intriguing library of (the absurdly named) Mrs. Delgado’s Rabbi landlord. There’s certainly plenty of material there for sequels, and I’m sure I’m not alone in eagerly awaiting them. Unless you have a pathological distaste for footnotes, or you simply don’t care for the Imperial English setting, this is a book I would have no hesitation recommending to a fantasy reader. It’s completely understandable why it’s up for a Hugo, and I wish it all the luck in the world.

“The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy”

April 5th, 2005

Often times you’ll hear certain books (or other media) referred to as having a golden age, a concept quite distinct from, say, the Golden Age of SNL or the Roman Empire. No, this “golden age” refers to the best age for the consumer to be exposed to the product, the age at which the appeals of the work are most effective and its flaws are most easily overlooked. When it comes to HHGttG, I missed it…twice. See, I read the first book of this tetralogy, The Hitchhicker’s Guide to the Galaxy itself back when I was…oh, twelve-ish. I’m not even sure. I was really young. I was too young, I guess, ’cause it didn’t work for me. The dim impression I had of it was that it had some funny bits but mostly just seemed full of nonsense. It wasn’t until I got a little older, and started having, like, friends, that I found out how many people basically worshipped this silly little book. I was enough of a knee-jerk iconoclast, though, that I just rode that wave of “Oh, I read it, I just didn’t think it was all that” for all it was worth. I’m not sure how much that was, actually…probably not enough. Some time ago I figured that was pretty silly, and that I really ought to give this thing another go, since others thought so highly of it and were so baffled by my opinion of it considering my other tastes. One thing or another, though, and I never got around to it. Well, the movie comes out in a couple of weeks, and it was being passed around by some friends, so I’m all “What the hell, count me in” and got in the queue after VeggieSteph. One of the good things about these books, without a doubt, is their easy readability. I don’t think it took me more than two or maybe three sittings to go through any one of them, and considering the little snippets of time I get most of my reading done in these days, that’s saying something. I think one of my problems with HHGttG the first time around was that it’s a terribly incomplete story, in a lot of ways, with very little substantive character growth, or much of anything accomplished…really it’s a complete set-up book. If you let the style carry you along, though (and this time I was certainly able to do that), the second book, The Restaraunt at the End of the Universe, really starts to get things moving. Arthur Dent finally starts to show a hint of personality (one of the biggest problems with the first book, IMO. Yes, I get it, the British Everyman isn’t supposed to have a personality…I get it, really), Zaphod gets some intrigue along with the story, Trillian begins to not just be fluffy nerd porn, and Marvin is annoying, which is the point. For me, Life, the Universe, and Everything was the best of the bunch, and brought things to a satisfying conclusion. In fact, I would have considered it a completely satisfactory conclusion if Adams hadn’t clumsily inserted the poor sap overdosing on Truth Serum bit. A very weak hook, AFAIC. Yes, I know there’s a fourth book. No, I probably won’t read it. So I enjoyed these, but I’m still not blown away. The Grant Naylor Red Dwarf books do the same thing considerably better IMO; and yes, I know they built on what Adams had already created, but that doesn’t mean that what they did can’t be substantively better in some ways. Anyway, these are a fun, light read, and if you’re one of those guys like me who likes to read the book right before the movie comes out, I can’t see any harm in it, and you won’t waste much time regardless of whether you’re in the “golden age” bracket or not. If you do happen to be between the ages of 14 and 20, say, and you’re reading this booklog entry without having read these books, then A.) Go out and read them, I bet you’ll like ’em; and B.) you’re not in my expected demographic, so please speak up and let me know what you think.

The Cassini Division

March 28th, 2005
This entry is part [part not set] of 2 in the series The Fall Revolution

There are several focuses which are usually predominant in science fiction, directions towards which an author may devote more energy in their work than others, although all are usually present in some degree. Some SF is all about building a world, making its structure and inhabitants as real to the reader as they are in the mind of the author. Some is largely about the science, or (often) one particular aspect of science taken to a logical extreme, with the implications that extrapolation might have for a society. Some is primarily focused on the idea of the Alien, both human and non, and how what we perceive as “normal” humanity would (or should) interact with “them.” The Cassini Division includes some of all of these, but its real focus, I would say, is on ideologies. This is political science fiction, and in some ways it treats politics in the same way that much of science fiction treats science…it takes ideologies to logical extremes, and then reflects on how society would structure itself under those conditions. MacLeod writes of a future in which technological advancement leads to an apocalyptic showdown between those who have replaced their flesh bodies with a computer representation of themself augmented by Artificial Intelligence. These post-humans, who settle and begin altering Jupiter, almost instantaneously achieve a Vingean Singularity, construct a wormhole through which to explore the Universe…and then go mad, spewing viruses designed to infect and destroy any networked computers, and potentially even the brains of anyone listening to an unencrypted radio signal. Modern society, deeply dependent on computers for its survival, collapses into anarchy, and that portion of humanity that lived in space is abruptly forced into self-sufficiency and must quickly find new ways to survive. What emerges from the rubble is a sort of Nietzschean socialist libertarianism, if that doesn’t break your brain. Absolute democracy, with everyone sharing an equal vote on all matters, adhoc local councils making any decisions at those levels, and everyone contributing and sharing to the extent that they are willing and able, enforced by their own abilities to enforce their will upon the world as an individual. This is all made possible by nanotechnologically supplied ubiquitous resources and functional immortality, with all computing done by analog, mechanical “babbage” computers immune to the digital viruses still being continuously broadcast from Jupiter, where the mysterious post-humans have been mysteriously quiet otherwise. Meanwhile, unknown to the new Communist society in the Solar System, an ultra-capitalist libertarian society has been developing and flourishing on the other side of the wormhole derived from servants of the post-humans who fled through it at the last possible moment. Not being hindered by the Jovian broadcasts, their terraformed world of “New Mars” develops along a more conventional computer and media-rich path, and recently sent a probe back through the wormhole to find out what happened to the old place. The probe, containing the downloaded minds of a human being and an autonomous A.I., was intercepted by the Executive and Military arm of the Solar System’s commune, the mysterious and independently powerful Cassini Division. Certain news about New Mars, along with an escalation of activity among the post-humans, prompts one of the Cassini Division’s highest leaders, on the quest for information that forms the basis of the plot of the book. Where this book excels, aside from some really nice space-opera bits, is in its realization of these extreme political extrapolations; but that’s also where many readers will doubtlessly stumble in their enjoyment. There’s more than a little bit of axe-grinding going on, here, as MacLeod is basically asserting through omission that a libertarian society is the only type of society that a truly advanced culture will find success in, or possibly that all stable societies will tend towards libertarianism. That’s pretty damn bold, when you get down to it, and I don’t know that I’d agree, but it makes for interesting reading. Recommended.

War for the Oaks

March 16th, 2005

I had pretty clear memories of folks discussing this book, so I went out searching the usual suspect booklogs for entries. No dice. Turns out I was remembering this old rasfwr-j thread from the pre-booklog days, which I then of course got completely distracted by and forgot I was starting to write a review. Anyway. This is a good book, but it is definitely not a great one, at least not for me and (apparently) a goodly number of people similar to me. It’s one of the books that everybody brings up when the sub-genre of “Urban Fantasy” comes around, and it’s definitely easy to see why. This is a fairy tale, with the Seelie and Unseelie courts, phoukas and brownies, and all the other assorted critters you’d expect. Set in Minneapolis. Or, at least, Minneapolis’ arty, rock-and-roll side. This isn’t just a book about fairies, after all…it’s at least as much about what it’s like to be in rock-and-roll bands of the un- and moderately successful sort. If that combination, or any of its components, obviously, don’t appeal, best to step away early and save yourself the trouble. Eddi McCandry is our narrator and protagonist; attractively pale and delicate, with (at least self-percieved) excellent fashion sense, but a first-rate rock guitarist with a motorcycle license and some never-explained fairie-ass-kicking abilities. So there’s that. She gets picked as a sort of magically mortal figurehead so that the war between the Dark and Light courts of the Fae can escalate to the next level and some serious killing can be done and thus decisions made about the fate of Minneapolis, but she’s not exactly happy with that. The fact that it makes her a target for assassination by magical beings of unpleasant visage and disposition probably has something to do with it, but to forestall her early demise (and prevent her escape) she is assigned as a bodyguard the member of the Sidhe who selected her for the role, a phouka who shall remain nameless. No, really. One of the major characters never ever gets named. He’s described in endless detail, though…his chocolate skin, his curly locks, and his muscular physique are narrated unceasingly in every scene. Picture Prince with the body of a Romance Cover model and the attitudes and fighting skills of Wolverine, and you’ll pretty much have it. In fact, since I mentioned it, you could slap a Romance Cover on this particular piece of speculative fiction and stock it in the appropriate part of the store. This is a romance novel, it just happens to also have fairies and rock-and-roll. It does have lots of rock-and-roll, mind you…but described from the vantage of a musician and a performer. This is not necessarily the same way that the average joe (i.e., Me) percieves music as a spectator, in fact it sometimes resembles it not at all. That I feel Bull did a pretty good job of conveying what it is to make music, and to make music with other musicians who match you and bring out the best of what you can accomplish musically, well, that just means (to me) that she and I must have some pretty similar ways of looking at things, and I could easily see that others might not share those perceptions. Anyway, that part of the book worked for me, even though I’m one of those people who mostly skips over anything in a book that’s arranged in verse. (As an aside, it reminded me a great deal of the descriptions of musical numbers depicted in Brust’s Cowboy Feng’s Spacebar & Grill, which is not terribly surprising considering that they’re both members of The Scribblies, and were both in a band together.) What didn’t work quite so well for me was the Faerie, or at least those parts of the Faerie that we saw interacting directly with the mortal world. Aside from a few misconceptions about humanity, the Phouka barely seemed to be Sidhe at all, which was persistently annoying. Other fairies in Eddi’s coterie are so blindingly, obviously fairies that it is ridiculous that Eddi and her other mortal friends who are in on it don’t get it immediately. Anytime the Fae are in thier own element, they’re well depicted, and the magic as portrayed was interesting and sometimes creepy…but the climactic ending is one of those occasions where the mortal world and the Sidhe are all mixed together, and it all just sort of falls on its face, in my opinion. So…I was entertained by this book, but I cannot wholeheartedly or generically recommend it to you, except as one of those books that is always going to come up in certain conversations. If you like what you hear, give it a go. If you don’t, I’d stay away.

The Tomorrow People

March 16th, 2005
This entry is part [part not set] of 2 in the series Ultimate X-Men

It appears to be common wisdom, these days, that our youth have somehow changed in caliber so completely that nothing of a previous generation will be considered valid or interesting anymore without enhancing its dramatic potential somehow. Common wisdom, at least, amongst the asinine marketing droids of the world who are responsible for making everything, and I mean everything, EXXXXTREEEEME!!!1! Unfortunately, sometimes they’re right. Ultimate X-Men, like all the Marvel “Ultimate” books, is a reimagining of one of their classic franchises so that it makes sense in a more modern setting…for X-men, that means this is set sometime next week for us, rather than sometime next week 40 years ago. This sort of treatment, for the X-Men in particular in many ways, is long overdue. The X-Men was so very groundbreaking in its day, but to a modern reader its controversies seem lukewarm, its political preconceptions archaic, and its squeaky-clean representation of youth unrealistic beyond the suspension of belief required to accept that a human being could shoot frickin’ laser beams from their frickin’ head. Ultimate X-Men has Bush as the President, reigning over a country held in the grip of terror since Mutants bombed New York. Tony Blair is his counterpart in the U.K. Mutants are killed by Sentinels as soon as they are detected; there’s no build-up there, in fact it’s how the book opens. The young mutants who are soon to become the X-men are outlaws de facto, and before they are drafted into Xavier’s little force they live the lives of outlaws. Storm is a car thief. Colossus…precious, naive Peter in the original, is a hardened (heh) arms dealer. There are similar, but logical ideas in store across the board. The language is more harsh, and more fresh. The sarcasm is heavy and feels like authentic snark. The sexual tension doesn’t stay stretched taut for absurd lengths…many of these “youths” are no strangers to sex, and that becomes pretty obvious pretty early. Loyalties are not certain, and good and evil is stretched even more than they were in the original, with Magneto’s warmth on display and Charles’ cavalier use of some pretty heavy mental alteration in effect. In short, this is good stuff. Very good stuff. I have to thank Koz for the recommendation on this one, I probably never would have picked this up if he hadn’t praised Volumes 2 & 3. Much obliged.

Skylark of Space & Skylark Three

March 10th, 2005
This entry is part [part not set] of 1 in the series Skylark of Space

(Prescript: This was intended as a fluff review of what really are fluff books. What I found instead was that I couldn’t review them and convey their absurdity without likewise covering the context in which they were written. Enjoy the slog.) I used to think I was pretty widely read, at least as far as science fiction and fantasy were concerned, after all, I’d read everything pretty much everything my local libraries had to offer. The Internet changed that idea, as it did so much else, and I soon began to realize how broad the genre was, how deep its roots were sunk, and how shallowly I had skimmed the surface of its history and potential. I resolved to study it as one would any other branch of literature, sampling from what was considered by the genre’s experts to be its great works and formative classics. The Skylark books are definitely the latter…opinions differ on their placement in the former. E.E. “Doc” Smith is one of the earliest writers of what could more-or-less accurately be called science fiction, and is credited by many as the Father of Space Opera (he is also commonly hailed as the grandfather of Star Wars, although the Lensman books have much more to do with that than Skylark did). Doc wrote fantastical fiction in which the heroes were scientists, or at least using science as a key element of his setting even if the “science” involved more or less demanded those scare quotes. The “science” seems laughable to anyone with a latter twentieth century education, but I’m sure it all seemed eminently plausible to his readers in the 20s when he wrote it all, and he was in fact a doctor of Chemical Engineering…just like the main character of the Skylark books…hmmm… (A warning before I get any further: The Skylark series was republished in the recent past by Bantam Spectra, and this is the set that I acquired. The only problem with this edition (which is pretty cheaply available), is that the folks over at Bantam evidently got confused by the title of the second book in the series, Skylark Three. As a result, everywhere on the cover copy of Skylark Three and the third book of the series Skylark of Valeron is their order reversed, including the numbers on the spines, labelling Valeron second and Three third. I was a good ways into Valeron before I figured that out, of course. That such an error could occur on books so short that it is inconceivable everyone in the publishing process couldn’t have read them with minimal effort and time, and yet none of them caught it, is mind-boggling.) The first book Skylark of Space, is the requisite origin and world-building story. It introduces us to the protagonist, Richard Seaton, in the moment of his discovery of the unique properties of a strange metallic mineral he obtained in a government lab and think-tank. Seaton, who shows a ridiculous reluctance to name the strange metal anything but “X”, accidentally finds that the application of a small electrical current to the mineral, when it is in contact with a sample of copper and in the presence of certain mysterious radiations, will catalyze the complete conversion to energy of the entire mass of the copper sample in a controllable reaction. That is, it accelerates off sideways from the direction in which the current was applied, completely ignoring stuff like gravitational attraction, and with almost all of the energy converted into pure directional force. Seaton immediately thinks to himself that he’s got a spacedrive on his hands. Fortunately, his best friend is the fabulously wealthy instrumentation inventor Martin Crane, who fronts up the funds to develop Seaton’s spaceship with nary a qualm about testing or liability. Unfortunately, his labmate is the cold-hearted and ruthless “Blackie” DuQuesne, who figures out what Seaton’s up to and enlists his secret employer, the evil and shady “World Steel Corporation” to try and steal the secrets and all of the material of “X” from Seaton & Crane. Failing that, they kidnap Seaton’s fiance, the fabulously wealthy, beautiful, auburn-haired daughter of an old Southern family, but then accidentally zip halfway across the galaxy in their knock-off copy of Seaton’s spaceship, the eponymous Skylark. Seaton goes to rescue her, discovers that relativistic effects and limits don’t actually occur (look at that hand waving, ladies and gents! Aint’ that something?), and zany adventures ensue. In case this didn’t sound hackneyed enough, I failed to mention that Seaton is a 6’5″ son of a lumberjack who grew up wrestling bears in the mountains, with the body of a world-class athlete, the hand-eye coordination of a champion sharpshooter, and the reflexes of a cyber-ninja. So, yeah. Spoilers begin below, but really…you don’t read these for plot… Read the rest of this entry »

Only Forward

February 20th, 2005

Every once in a while, you’ll find yourself reading something that defies any sort of convenient genre classification. This one goes one step further than that, it is simultaneously several different genres, and perhaps fits best into none of them at all. For the first half of the book, it reads like straightforward, slightly pulpy, adventure sci-fi, but there are some niggling inconsistencies to it. Smith tells this story through a tight 1st-person perspective, and it seems (at first) like a pretty typical worldbuilding-style SF novel with touches of hard-boiled in the mysterious, but private-detective-like lifestyle of our protagonist, Stark. The world Smith creates is certainly interesting, an indeterminately far future society of super-metropolises (nations don’t really exist anymore, no one seemed to be terribly interested…) that cover most of the land mass, divided into politically sovereign Neighbourhoods that are organized, loosely or strictly, based on the preferred interests and lifestyles of their inhabitants. Stark lives in a mostly quiet Neighbourhood called Color, where everything (literally…walls, floors, lighting…all of it computer controlled by ubiquitous AI) is color coordinated in as aesthetically pleasing a fashion as possible, and changes on the fly to suit the mood and wardrobes of its inhabitants. At one point, Stark receives a message from one of the Neighbourhood’s coordinators, complementing him on what a pleasure it had been working with his pants that day. Color is just one of the neighbourhoods we are introduced to though. We also see the Action Center, a hypertensive Japanese executive’s idea of Heaven; Red, a near-anarchic sprawl of gangs, drugs, crime and poverty; Stable, a closed in colony of isolationists, living for centuries in their own little version of “The Truman Show”; and several other odd spaces. It’s an interesting idea, that a society enabled with instant mobility, ubiquitous information, and devices intelligent and flexible enough to replace humans for almost all menial and most intellectual labor, would divide themselves geographically into those areas which are dominated by people who share the same interests. You can’t help but envision other neighbourhoods that Smith doesn’t describe, and wonder what it would be like to live in the Star Trek neighbourhood, or the Anime neighbourhood, or whatever… But few books manage to just be about a setting, without having a plot, and this is no exception. Stark is hired by an old friend to search for a missing person, and goes about using his extensive personal contacts to do so. He gets into some action-packed adventures as he does so, in fashions that seem Matrix-esque to this reader, and wisecracks and ass-kicks his way through several scrapes as he tries to find his man, but as he describes all this action to us, something (to the attentive reader) just won’t seem to fit. Why does the narrator’s voice seem like it belongs to someone of our time? It’s hard to put a finger on where the anachronisms lie or why they might be there, as Stark rarely divulges any of his past and, most of the time, seems to fit into the fantastic world around him like it was built just for him to kick ass in…but there’s definitely something out of place, and Smith lets you in on it eventually. Suddenly, this book stops being Science Fiction featuring technology that is almost indistinguishable from magic, and starts being Fantasy. Fantasy of an elaborate sort, even, requiring a whole new round of world building and reconceptions of the characters and settings we’ve been exposed to so far. Eventually, you find yourself questioning everything, and everyone, around Stark…and finally Stark himself and the nature of his reality. This is a challenging book that sneaks up on you. It starts in as easy-going fun, and doesn’t lose its sense of humor throughout, but the plot is anything but straightforward and the setting is fractally complex. A surprising read, but if what I describe sounds interesting, I’ll recommend it. (P.S.: I have to thank “Greg G,” who recommended this book to me as “A Writer For People Who Like Warren Ellis” in one of Making Light’s open threads. There are numerous other interesting and excellent recommendations for reading material in that thread, and if you’re ever at a loss as to what to get when you’re headed out for a book, that would not be so bad a place to start.)

Neverness

February 14th, 2005

For much of my reading history, I’ve been on a steady diet of epic fantasy…the kind of novels that have earned various derogatory nicknames by those who don’t care for them, like “EFP” or “Doorstop Fiction.” I sometimes wonder if I’ve developed a warped sense of pacing because of it, or perhaps it really is the case that a lot of fiction is rushed (relatively) to accomplish what the author wants in the space he perceives available. That’s certainly what this novel felt like, and it’s something I’ve noticed seems particularly common in first novels written outside of the “glory days” of gigantic novels in the ’90s. Neverness is certainly epic in scope, describing both a far future world of Clarke’s-3rd-Law-applicable advanced science, but also taking us through the daily lives of Neanderthals and their icy world. The stark disparity between these two settings (which are, in fact, seperated by only miles within the context of the story) led to much of my feeling that what I was reading really should have been more than one book. For a (spoiler-free) summary and analysis, look below the fold… Read the rest of this entry »

The Knight

January 31st, 2005
This entry is part [part not set] of 2 in the series The Wizard Knight

There is a quote attributed to Pablo Picasso in which he says “It took me four years to paint like Raphael, but a lifetime to paint like a child.” I don’t know if he ever really said that, but it certainly matches to what I know of the man, his ego, and his master works. In The Knight, Gene Wolfe plays with our conceptions of both the genre of Epic Fantasy, and what it means to be mature as a human being; but I’d say a big part of this book is playing with language, and phrasing the deeds and desires of adults through the voice of a child. That’s the real trick of this story, that it is the story of a boy, not a man, “just a little kid” as he thinks to himself over and over again. This American pre-teen, orphaned but with an older brother to care for him, wandered into the wilderness one day on a hike and found himself in another world, with his memories all muddled about who he was and where he came from. He was told the name he should use was “Able of the High Heart,” and thus far in the story we have learned no other. He finds himself a new guardian in this strange place, and adapts to a primitive new world, hunting and gathering to survive, and learning of its magical and mythic nature and bestiary. One day, however, he finds himself ensnared by a Faery Queen, who seduces him…yes, seduces this young boy in a quite literal way. This is made slightly less creepy by the fact that she uses her powers to transform his body into that of a grown man…an immensely grown man, in fact, of great strength and powerful build, but his mind is not likewise transformed. The pleasures she shows him (and perhaps his own natural inclinations) cause Able to fall deeply into an obsessive love for the Queen, and his desire to impress her, be worthy of her, and be with her physically motivates almost his every action in this story. Able goes on to have many adventures as he learns (along with us) more about this world, and Wolfe’s text rolls ever onward in page after symbolically laden page of prose. This is many-layered stuff, but written with strict perfection in a style that is entirely unique in my experience. Able has the body of a man, and the desires of a man, and the capabilities of a superhero…but his mind was forced to jump a big step, and he was never educated in the written language of our world past an elementary (literally) level. The way he phrases and describes events is far more direct and plain than anyone who passed through the angst of adolescence and was exposed to the graceful and subtle written word of the adult world would ever write. Likewise, his actions are not always likeable…he is sometimes inconsiderate of others, and often a bully, as those who come into easy strength unworked for often are. He lacks some of the empathy that comes with maturity and wisdom, and is impetuous and naive. With this mechanism, Wolfe, famed for his subtle fiction, recreates in prose what Picasso achieved with paint…he writes like a child, and it is our good fortune to see this mastery of the art he has chosen. I look forward to the second book of this duology, The Wizard, but as first books go, this is one I recommend.

“The Baroque Cycle”

January 24th, 2005

(I have recently been requested, by my most vital critic, to shorten my sentences and attempt to reduce the number of clauses, juggled hither and yon, that populate my prose divided only by ephemeral commas. To which I can only respond that reviewing The Baroque Cycle, particularly having just come from reading it, is not the best lead-in to such a reformation.) As a reader, and particularly as a reader of “genre” fiction, there are two key principles which I seek to find in the material I select for said entertainment: Distraction, and Enlightenment. Distraction should be self-evident, and one would think relatively easy to accomplish, but may actually be the more difficult to achieve. In order to effectively distract a modern, intelligent reader, one must grasp both a degree of the novelty that is vanishingly scarce in our media-flooded world; and present it in such a fashion, and at a sufficient pace, as to maintain the focus of our attention deficient brains. Enlightenment may, on the other hand, be found in numerous and varying degrees, at least in the definition of such that I intend. By “enlightenment,” I mean the expanding of one’s perception in some regard. This can be accomplished the hard way, through inculcation of philosophical concepts and principles, or in diverse small ways, through the introduction of minute bits of knowledge about the way the world works through metaphorical vehicles the student can relate to those principles of the world they already grasp through their own observations; and all but the poorest of “Science Fiction” could be said to attempt the latter. Stephenson, in “The Baroque Cycle,” not only Distracts the reader so thoroughly that they must take care lest it intrude upon their personal and professional lives, but he also Enlightens us as he shows us the ways in which this world called “modern” came to be. In truth, these are not three different novels, but one ginormous one divided into three physical books, which are reviewed below… Read the rest of this entry »